• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 12.02.2025

Revised 23.04.2025

Accepted 28.06.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 1, 2025

Pages 44 -50

  • 165 Views

Suggested citation

Kvatadze, A., & Stozhka, V. (2025). Integration of protective shelters into road infrastructure: a systematic review of international experience. The National Transport University Bulletin, 29(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-1-60-044-050

Integration of protective shelters into road infrastructure: a systematic review of international experience

A. Kvatadze Vitalii Stozhka

Abstract

The article presents a systematic review of international experience in integrating protective shelters into road infrastructure based on case studies from Europe and Asia. The research analyses technical, structural, and behavioural aspects of implementing dual-purpose protective facilities, including the SWETO system, and assesses their potential adaptation to Ukrainian conditions. Special attention is paid to design challenges, economic feasibility, behavioural factors during evacuation, and accessibility of shelters for the population. Object of research – integration of protective shelters into transport infrastructure as part of the civil protection system. Purpose of the study to systematize international experience in implementing dual-purpose protective shelters within road infrastructure and identify ways of adapting these solutions to the Ukrainian context. Research methods. Analysis, comparison, systematization of international practices, generalization of technical and behavioural aspects, and a systems approach. The modern context of military threats requires reconsidering the role of transport infrastructure as a potential component of civil protection systems. International practice demonstrates that integrated shelters (SWETO, multifunctional tunnels, dual-purpose bunkers) can ensure rapid protection for the population without extensive new construction. Successful implementations have been recorded in Switzerland, Norway, South Korea, and China. The study highlights the relevance of modular shelters embedded into existing Ukrainian road facilities, taking into account technical, social, and regulatory factors

Keywords:

shelters; road structure; protective facilities; road tunnels; dual-purpose infrastructure; SWETO; highways

References

  1. Shelters in single-tube road tunnels (2016). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, [online] URL: https://ebooks.uis.no/index.php/USPS/catalog/book/272

  2. HuffPost / Seoul Solution (2023). In Seoul, Confusion And Apathy Surround City’s 3,200 Bomb Shelters. HuffPost / Seoul Solution. – [online]. URL: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/seoul-bombshelters_n_59927081e4b09071f69c2539.

  3. WHO-EURO (2025). Underground shelters and services in hospitals. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, 2025. 11046-50818-77024 (electronic edition). License: CC BYNC-SA 3.0 IGO. – [online]. URL: https://www.who.int/europe.

  4. Swiss Review (2022). Sonnenberg bunker is drawing attention due to the war in Ukraine. Swiss Review – [online]. URL: https://www.swisscommunity.org/en/news-media/swiss-revue/article/sonnenbergbunker-is-drawing-attention-due-to-the-war-in-ukraine.

  5. Zhao X., Yang K., Li Y., et al. (2023) Tunnel fire evacuation: A review in China. Fire Technology, Preprint. – [online]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366627318_A_Review_of_Tunnel_Fire_Evacuation_Strategies_and_State-of-the-Art_Research_in_China.

  6. Kim S., Kim J., Kim H., et al. (2022). Evacuation of Shelter in Place at Subway Transfer Stations during Tunnel Fires: Case of Seoul. Sustainability, 14(15), p. 5491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111981.

  7. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2004/54/EC on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network. – Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union, 2009. – [online]. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A02004L0054-20090807

  8. Jiang, H. et al. (2024). Effects of fire smoke on evacuation in road tunnels with refuge areas: A simulation study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(2), p. 275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-024-00275-7

  9. He, L. & Xie, Z., 2022. Optimization of Urban Shelter Locations Using Bi-Level Multi-Objective Location-Allocation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), p.4401. [online]. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4401

  10. CEN. EN 12101-6:2022. Smoke and heat control systems – Part 6: Specification for pressure differential systems – Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2022. – [online]. URL: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/5f126835-6b1a-4fbd-ba4b-2fe1d81669e7/en-12101-6-2022?srsltid=AfmBOopkUdb6-lOugikuK_RZ0YE_u2tbIlLVIS2CBcoCYXEYGDaJtFQc

  11. NFPA. NFPA 502: Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways. – Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2020. – [online]. URL: https://firegas.com/storage/2024/06/NFPA-502-2020-Tunnel-Road.pdf

  12. CEN. EN 13123-1 / EN 13124-1:2001. Windows, doors and shutters – Explosion resistance – Requirements and classification – Part 1: Shock tube test method. – Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2001. – [online]. URL: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/461b9de1-be7f-4ae8-a8c6-7ce5c0c51c18/en-13123-1-2001

  13. CEN. EN 13124-1:2001. Windows, doors and shutters – Explosion resistance – Requirements and classification – Part 1: Shock tube test method. – Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2001. – [online]. URL: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/d140989d-e237-4f85-b02ca4ab73c0c67c/en-13124-1-2001?srsltid=AfmBOoqgAZWF8aTfGlC8DvwXeDKtIHDLtV3yDtMVL3nWFo5-W1-9PIXG&

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-1-60-044-050

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving