• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 27.01.2026

Revised 02.06.2026

Accepted 25.06.2026

Published 06.07.2026

Retrieved from Vol. 30, No. 2, 2026

Pages 73 -82

  • 68 Views

Suggested citation

Tkachenko, D., & Vyhovska, I. (2026). Criterion for reducing traffic delays at a roundabout exit in the presence of a public transport stop. The National Transport University Bulletin, 30(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2026-2-30-73-82

Criterion for reducing traffic delays at a roundabout exit in the presence of a public transport stop

Dmytro Tkachenko, Inna Vyhovska*

i.vyhovska2609@gmail.com

Abstract

The efficiency of roundabout intersections largely depends on traffic conditions at their exit sections, in particular the location of public transport stops immediately after the exit or in its vicinity, which reduces capacity and increases delays due to forced lane-changing manoeuvres and a shortage of acceptable gaps in the traffic stream. The aim of the study was to develop criteria for reducing traffic delays at the exit of a roundabout in the presence of a public transport stop, taking into account vehicle lane-changing processes and the critical gap in the adjacent traffic lane. The study was conducted using principles of traffic flow theory, methods for evaluating intersection capacity, and approaches for determining critical gaps; it was also shown that delays at roundabout exits are caused by right-lane blockage by public transport, demand for lane changing, and insufficient acceptable gaps in the adjacent stream within a local critical zone. A system of delay-reduction criteria is proposed, based on minimising total delay in the local critical zone, ensuring consistency between traffic demand and effective exit capacity, and matching lane-changing demand with the possibility of its execution under existing traffic conditions. Conditions for the transition of the traffic stream to a critical operating regime were also defined in terms of speed, density, and capacity indicators. To validate the proposed methodological approach, a computational scenario of a two-lane roundabout exit was considered. With an exit traffic flow of 1,000 veh/h, adjacent lane flow of 900 veh/h, and an average right-lane blocking time by public transport of 25 s, a lane occupancy coefficient of φ = 0.125 was obtained, resulting in a reduction of effective capacity to 1575 veh/h. Under these conditions, traffic demand does not exceed the effective exit capacity, ensuring stable traffic operation and enabling lane-changing manoeuvres without the formation of critical delays. The obtained results may be used to justify the location of urban public transport stops, determine the length of weaving sections, and select organisational and technical measures aimed at improving the efficiency of roundabout operation and reducing traffic delays

Keywords:

traffic management; lane-changing manoeuvres; critical gap; lane blockage; bottlenecks

References

  1. Abu Hamad, F., Hasiba, R., Shahwan, D., & Ashqar, H.I. (2024). Driver behavior at roundabouts in mixed traffic: A case study using machine learning. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 150(12). doi: 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8325.
  2. Austroads. (2017). Guide to traffic management, part 3: Traffic studies and analysis. Sydney: Austroads.
  3. Campi, E., Mastinu, G., Previati, G., Studer, L., & Uccello, L. (2024). Roundabouts: Traffic simulations of connected and automated vehicles – a state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(5), 3305-3325. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3325000.
  4. Čulík, K., Kalašová, A., Fabian, P., & Ondruš, J. (2025). Enhancing intersection efficiency: A comparative analysis of converting single-lane roundabout to turbo roundabout. Sensors, 25(22), article number 7002. doi: 10.3390/s25227002.
  5. Cvitanić, D. (2017). Joint impact of bus stop location and configuration on intersection performance. Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 29(4), 443-454. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v29i4.2338.
  6. DBN V.2.3-5:2018. (2018). Streets and roads of settlements. Retrieved from https://e-construction.gov.ua/laws_detail/3199686959802877315?doc_type=2.
  7. DSTU 2587:2021. (2021). Road traffic safety. Road markings. General technical specifications. Test methods. Rules of application. Retrieved from https://zakon.isu.net.ua/sites/default/files/normdocs/dstu_2587_2021.pdf.
  8. DSTU 4100:2021. (2021). Road traffic safety. Traffic signs. General technical specifications. Rules of application. Retrieved from https://zakon.isu.net.ua/sites/default/files/normdocs/dstu_4100_2021.pdf.
  9. GBN V.2.3-37641918-550:2018. (2018). Automobile roads. Public transport stops. General design requirements. Retrieved from https://restoration.gov.ua/documents/gbn-v-2-3-37641918-5502018-avtomobilni-dorogy-zupynky-marshrutnogo-transportu/.
  10. Giuffrè, O., Granà, A., & Tumminello, M.L. (2016). Gap-acceptance parameters for roundabouts: A systematic review. European Transport Research Review, 8, article number 2. doi: 10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4.
  11. Guerrieri, M. (2024). A practical method for assessing sustainable traffic levels of roundabouts in urban areas using the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Sustainable Futures, 7, article number 100157. doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100157.
  12. Hagring, O. (2001). Derivation of capacity equation for roundabout entry with mixed circulating and exiting flows. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1776, 91-99. doi: 10.3141/1776-12.
  13. Jiang, H., Shen, Q., Li, A., & Yin, C. (2024). A review of traffic behaviour and intelligent driving at roundabouts based on a microscopic perspective. Transportation Safety and Environment, 6(3), article number tdad031. doi: 10.1093/tse/tdad031.
  14. Jin, H., Yu, J., & Yang, X. (2019). Impact of curbside bus stop locations on mixed traffic dynamics: A bus route perspective. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 15(2), 1419-1439. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2019.1601789.
  15. Liang, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). A three-stage cellular automata model of complex large roundabouts. Sensors, 24(23), article number 7672. doi: 10.3390/s24237672.
  16. Lieberthal, E.B., Serok, N., Duan, J., Zeng, G., & Havlin, S. (2024). Addressing the urban congestion challenge based on traffic bottlenecks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 382(2285), article number 20240095. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0095.
  17. Medvediev, I., & Soroka, S. (2020). The road network traffic capacity taking into account public transport stops layout method. Transport Technologies, 1(2), 13-22. doi: 10.23939/tt2020.02.013.
  18. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2010). Roundabouts: An informational guide (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22914.
  19. Polus, A., Shmueli Lazar, S., & Livneh, M. (2003). Critical gap as a function of waiting time in determining roundabout capacity. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129(5), 504-509. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(504).
  20. Riaz, M., Khan, S., Ahmad, M., & Ullah, N. (2023). Strategic utilization of microsimulation for sustainable traffic management. The Open Transportation Journal, 17, article number e26671212281061. doi: 10.2174/011874444326671212281061.
  21. Shaaban, K., & Hamad, H. (2020). Critical gap comparison between one-, two-, and three-lane roundabouts in Qatar. Sustainability, 12(10), article number 4232. doi: 10.3390/su12104232.
  22. Yang, X., Mei, H., & Gao, Z. (2013). Car delay model near bus stops with mixed traffic flow. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, article number 437637. doi: 10.1155/2013/437637.
  23. Zadobrischi, E. (2025). Traffic and vehicle management in roundabouts through systems based on dedicated short-range communications and visible light communications. Electronics, 14(2), article number 317. doi: 10.3390/electronics14020317.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2026-2-30-73-82

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving