• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 11.02.2026

Revised 03.06.2026

Accepted 25.06.2026

Published 06.07.2026

Retrieved from Vol. 30, No. 2, 2026

Pages 53 -64

  • 53 Views

Suggested citation

Porfirenko, V., & Luhovtsov, A. (2026). Break-even analysis of electric vehicles in business operations. The National Transport University Bulletin, 30(2), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2026-2-30-53-64

Break-even analysis of electric vehicles in business operations

Volodymyr Porfirenko*, Anton Luhovtsov

porfirenko@gmail.com

Abstract

The electrification of commercial transport is regarded as a promising approach to reducing operating costs and local emissions; however, the economic benefits of electric vehicles are not universal and depend on the conditions of use. The relevance of this study is driven by the need for businesses to have quantitative criteria for choosing between an electric commercial vehicle and a comparable fossil-fuel-powered alternative under different operating conditions and energy pricing structures. The aim of the study was to develop a calculation-based approach for determining the break-even annual mileage above which the use of an electric vehicle becomes economically viable, as well as the maximum acceptable purchase price of an electric vehicle below which its acquisition is economically justified. The research methods included a comparative analysis of the economic feasibility of alternative technologies; analysis of secondary data on prices, tariffs, and maintenance costs to establish model input parameters; economic and mathematical modelling based on total cost of ownership; analytical methods for deriving break-even formulas; scenario analysis of different electric vehicle charging options; and consideration of the time value of money through the application of a discount rate and an annuity present value factor. Within the framework of a model case study (10-year horizon, 5% discount rate), it was established that the break-even annual mileage of an electric van ranges from 34,529 to 200,932 km depending on the tariff and charging method, while at an annual mileage of 60,000 km, the maximum economically justified purchase price ranges from UAH 2.25 million to UAH 4.44 million. The article analyses the factors determining the feasibility of transitioning to electric vehicles, evaluates the impact of initial investments, operating costs, and existing support mechanisms on the overall economic viability of electric vehicle use in business activities, and proposes formulas for calculating both the break-even mileage of electric vehicles and the maximum initial purchase price below which their acquisition is economically advantageous for different types of commercial use. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of applying the proposed formulas by transport and logistics companies and commercial fleet operators to support fleet renewal decisions based on the present value of ownership costs

Keywords:

total cost of ownership; annual mileage; operating costs; threshold purchase price; internal combustion engines; economic viability

References

  1. APS Smart. (2025). When price is not the main thing: How to calculate costs like a pro using TCO. Retrieved from https://www.aps-smart.com/koli-tsina-ne-golovne-yak-rahuvati-po-doroslomu-za-dopomogoyu-tco.
  2. Bauer, J., Letmathe, P., & Woeste, R. (2025). Total cost of ownership for battery electric vehicles: The role of energy prices. Applied Energy, 389, article number 125764. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125764.
  3. Delina, L.L., & Shi, L. (2025). Sustainable mobility transitions in developing states: A comparison of Southeast Asia’s electric mobility policies and aspirations. Sustainable Futures, 9, article number 100751. doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100751.
  4. Denzadnem. (2025). Is it profitable to buy an electric car in 2025? A detailed breakdown. Retrieved from https://denzadnem.com.ua/blogy/korysni-porady/199652.
  5. Dixon, J., Zhou, Z., Phommachanh, S., Kythavone, S., Inthavongsa, P., & Hirmer, S.A. (2023). Plugging into green growth: Towards e-mobility and renewable energy integration in Lao PDR. Energy Strategy Reviews, 48, article number 101099. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101099.
  6. Dulău, L.-I. (2024). Study of the total ownership cost of electric vehicles in Romania. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(12), article number 569. doi: 10.3390/wevj15120569.
  7. E-AUTO. (2023). Types of electric vehicles (BEV, HEV, PHEV, FCEV). Retrieved from https://e-auto.in.ua/vidi-elektromobiliv-bev-hev-phev-fcev/.
  8. Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Capa vehicle. Retrieved from https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/37079.
  9. Figenbaum, E. (2022). Retrospective total cost of ownership analysis of battery electric vehicles in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, article number 103246. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103246.
  10. Ford. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ford.ua/.
  11. Gil Ribeiro, C., & Silveira, S. (2024). The impact of financial incentives on the total cost of ownership of electric light commercial vehicles in EU countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 179, article number 103936. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103936.
  12. Hafsah, H., Dianti, D.V., Priandana, E.R., Chandrasa, G.T., Rianjani, D.A., & Aryono, N.A. (2024). Break-even analysis of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles in the Indonesian market. Evergreen, 11(3), 2415-2426. doi: 10.5109/7236884.
  13. Heisel, R. (2020). Consumer reports study finds electric vehicle maintenance costs are 50% less than gas-powered cars. Retrieved from https://betterenergy.org/blog/consumer-reports-study-finds-electric-vehicle-maintenance-costs-are-50-less-than-gas-powered-cars/.
  14. Kostenko, H. (2023). Situation analysis of electric transport development prospects and its integration into Ukraine’s power system. Energy: Economics, Technology, Ecology, 1, 117-124. doi: 10.20535/1813-5420.1.2023.276185.
  15. Li, Y., Zhu, F., Li, L., & Ouyang, M. (2024). Electrifying heavy-duty truck through battery swapping. Joule, 8(6), 1556-1561. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2024.04.008.
  16. Matusiak, S.K., & Romaniuta, E.E. (2025). Impact of government incentives on the BEV market in Europe and a forecast for Ukraine after 2026. Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal, 9, 196-200. doi: 10.32782/2786-765X/2025-9-26.
  17. Miązek, P., & Zhang, L.L. (2025). Analysis of the total cost of ownership of electric and combustion engine trucks used in Poland. European Research Studies Journal, 28(3), 1280-1289. doi: 10.35808/ersj/4226.
  18. Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J.M., & Hladik, G. (2023). Evaluation of barriers to electric vehicle adoption: A study of technological, environmental, financial, and infrastructure factors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, article number 100962. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100962.
  19. Porfirenko, V.I., & Kudin, Y.R. (2024). International transportation by electric vehicles: Advantages of using the modular principle of sectional release and battery replacement. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, 116(1), 294-313. doi: 10.33744/0365-8171-2024-116.1-294-313.
  20. Prushkivska, E.V., Prushkivsky, V.G., Maksymenko, I.Y., & Prushkivska, V.V. (2024). Global electric vehicle market and prospects for Ukraine’s contribution to its development. Academy Review, 1(60), 258-271. doi: 10.32342/2074-5354-2024-1-60-19.
  21. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union No. 851 “As Regards Strengthening the CO2 Emission Performance Standards for New Passenger Cars and New Light Commercial Vehicles in Line with the Union’s Increased Climate Ambition”. (2023, April). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32023R0851.
  22. Romeral, P.A. de A.F., & Zancul, E. (2025). Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles: A synthesis of critical factors. The Journal of Engineering, 2025(1), article number e70113. doi: 10.1049/tje2.70113.
  23. Scherrer, A., Lockwood, M., Burghard, U., & Rogge, K.S. (2026). Institutional barriers to dynamic truck charging: Why electric road systems struggle in Europe. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 153, article number 105154. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2025.105154.
  24. Shepurov, K.O. (2025). Features of charging infrastructure placement and electric bus charging strategies. Bulletin of Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, 110, 167-174. doi: 10.30977/BUL.2219-5548.2025.110.0.167.
  25. Sistig, H.M., Sinhuber, P., Rogge, M., & Sauer, D.U. (2025). Evaluating costs and operations of public bus fleet electrification. Npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport, 2, article number 15. doi: 10.1038/s44333-025-00030-y.
  26. Stetsiuk, O., Lozynskyi, R., Skliarska, O., & Labinska, H. (2024). Electromobility in Ukraine: Development realities, European context, and the impact of martial law. Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, 9(37), 771-795. doi: 10.52058/2786-5274-2024-9(37)-770-795.
  27. Twin, A. (2025). Total cost of ownership: How it’s calculated with example. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/totalcostofownership.asp.
  28. Woody, M., Adderly, S.A., Bohra, R., & Keoleian, G.A. (2024). Electric and gasoline vehicle total cost of ownership across US cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 28(2), 194-215. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13463.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2026-2-30-53-64

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving