• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 01.01.1970

Revised 27.04.2025

Accepted 28.06.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 1, 2025

Pages 88 -97

  • 164 Views

Suggested citation

Minyukova, A., & Stashuk, P. (2025). Assessment of the structural reliability of VTP-16 beams with a length of 16.76 m when adapted to AK-15 class loads. The National Transport University Bulletin, 29(1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-1-60-088-097

Assessment of the structural reliability of VTP-16 beams with a length of 16.76 m when adapted to AK-15 class loads

Anna Minyukova Pavlo Stashuk

Abstract

The article is devoted to the assessment of the structural reliability of VTP-16 bridge beams with a span length of 16.76 m under adaptation to modern traffic loads of class AK-15. The study includes an analysis of the bearing capacity of the beams in their original condition, identification of compliance with the design standards of the period when they were constructed, and justification of the need for strengthening to 97 97 ensure operational reliability under current increased loads. Numerical modeling was carried out to evaluate different strengthening approaches, including reinforcement with conventional steel bars and external prestressed tendons. The obtained results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed strengthening methods and confirm their applicability for extending the service life and safety of existing bridge structures. Objective – to assess the load-bearing capacity and structural reliability of VTP-16 bridge beams under AK-15 class loads, and to determine effective strengthening methods using conventional and prestressed reinforcement. Methodology – a 3D model of the beam was developed in the LIRA-SAPR software package, with calculations performed for load-bearing capacity according to the first group of limit states and for crack resistance according to the second group. The effectiveness of strengthening was evaluated by introducing additional conventional reinforcement and external prestressed reinforcement. Results – it was established that in their initial state, VTP-16 beams comply with the design norms of past years (H-30, NK-80), but do not provide sufficient load-bearing capacity under modern loads (AK-15, NK-100). Calculations showed that strengthening the beams with 32 mm diameter conventional reinforcement ensures normative strength, while the use of four 15.2 mm diameter prestressed strands provides increased load-bearing capacity, reduced deflections, and prevents cracking during operation. Conclusions – the study confirms the feasibility of strengthening VTP-16 bridge beams to adapt them to modern traffic loads. The use of prestressed reinforcement is the most effective method, ensuring the required levels of strength, stiffness, and crack resistance, thereby enhancing the reliability and durability of bridge structures

Keywords:

reinforced concrete span structures; durability of structures; fatigue damage; additional prestressing; strengthening method; external prestressing

References

  1. Klyuchnik, S. V., & Marochka, V. V. (2014). Review of Strengthening and Repair Options for Superstructure Deck Beams. Bridges and Tunnels: Theory, Research, Practice, (5), 35–40.
  2. Kim, T.-K., Jung, W.-T., Park, J.-S., & Park, H.-B. (year). Experimental Study on Effects of Additional Prestressing Using Fiber Reinforced Polymers and Strands on Deterioration of PSC Bridge Structure.
  3. Bodnar, L., Zavhorodniy, S., & Yastrubinetskyi, V. (2020). Analysis of typical designs of the most common reinforced concrete bridge span on the motor roads of Ukraine. Dorogi i mosti [Roads and bridges], Iss. 22, P. 176-186 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Stoianovych, S., & Poliuga, R. (2023). Research of the stressed and deformed state of a reinforced concrete monolithic pre-stressed runway structure. Dorogi i mosti [Roads and bridges], Iss. 28, P. 221–233 [in Ukrainian].
  5. DSTU 9181:2022 Guidelines for assessing and forecasting the technical condition of road bridges. Kyiv, 2022. – 32 p. (Information and documentation).
  6. Lantukh-Liashchenko, A. I. (2001). Model for determining the reliability of a span structure under conditions of incomplete information. Collection «Highways and Road Construction», Issue 62, Kyiv.
  7. Lantukh-Liashchenko, A. I. (1999). Assessment of structural reliability using a Markov stochastic process model with discrete states. Collection «Highways and Road Construction», Issue 57, P. 183-188.
  8. DBN V.2.3-22:2009 Bridges and culverts. Basic design requirements.
  9. Borshchov, V. I., & Zakora, O. L. (2012). Bridges and culverts. Textbook. Vol. 2. Reinforced concrete bridges. Dnipro: Publishing House of DNUZT, 393 p.
  10. Popovych, M. M., Myroniuk, O. S., & Borshchov, V. I. Strengthening of reinforced concrete girder spans using struts and prestressed rods.
  11. R V.3.2-03450778-832:2013 Recommendations for the design of monolithic prestressed bridges with stress applied to concrete (post-tensioning systems).
  12. Guganesan, T. Suntharavadivel, & Aravinthan, T. Overview of external post-tensioning in bridges.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-1-60-088-097

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving