• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 30.09.2024

Revised 05.11.2024

Accepted 25.12.2024

Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 2, 2024

Pages 12 -23

  • 190 Views

Suggested citation

Bakalinsky, O., & Van Acker, V. (2024). Segmentation of train passengers based on the cognitive-affective profile of consumer value of transport services. The National Transport University Bulletin, 28(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2024-2-59-012-023

Segmentation of train passengers based on the cognitive-affective profile of consumer value of transport services

Oleksandr Bakalinsky Veronique Van Acker

Abstract

This article uses data from an online train passenger survey conducted in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. The sample includes 536 respondents. The survey included questions about attributes of the customer value of the public transport service and passengers' emotions during the last trip. The cognitive profile of the customer value of the transport service was defined as the difference between the passenger's benefits and sacrifices. Respondents' cognitive reactions to attributes of benefits and sacrifices were measured. Emotions during the last trip were determined using the semantic differential scale. The cognitive-affective profile of the customer value of the transport service was built on the basis of the cognitive profile with the addition of the passenger's positive emotions to the benefits and his negative emotions to the sacrifices. 23 Passengers were segmented based on cognitive and cognitive-affective profiles. The segmentation variables were benefits, sacrifices, and customer value of the public transportat service. The most powerful source of managerial information for improving the public transport service is the segmentation based on the cognitive profile. This is followed by segmentation based on the cognitiveaffective profile. This sequence is completed by an approach to marketing research based on understanding of the market as homogeneous. Segmentation based on the cognitive profile of the customer value of the public transport service is a practical management tool, which is achieved due to its simplicity, ease of use and, as a result, the comprehensibility of the results. It provides the transport operator with opportunities that other approaches to segmentation provide only partially. Originality/novelty This is the first study in which the results of market segmentation based on cognitive and cognitiveaffective profiles of customer value of public transport services are compared from a managerial point of view

Keywords:

consumer value; public transport; segmentation; cognitive; affective; profile; service improvement

References

  1. Lovelock H Christopher. (1975) A Market Segmentation Approach to Transit Planning, Modeling and Management, Sixteenth Annual Canadian transportation research forum, November 3-5, Toronto, Canada, Volume XVI, Number 1, 247-258.
  2. Anable J., Lane B., Kelay T. (2006) A review of public attitudes to climate change and transport: Summary report. London: Department for Transport.
  3. Emlore-Yalch R. (1998) A Handbook: Using Market Segmentation to Increase Transit Ridership. Transit Cooperative Research Program, 77 p.
  4. Bakalinskyi O. (2017) Total management of customer service value, Kyiv, State University of Infrastructure and Technologies, 140 p. [Ukrainian]
  5. Calvo-Porral C., Lévy-Mangin J.-P. (2020) An emotion-based segmentation of bank service customers, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 38 (7), 1441-1463.
  6. Millán Angel, Fanjul María Luisa, Moital Miguel (2016) Segmenting the Business Traveler Based on Emotions, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention, Psychology & Marketing, 33(2), 82–93.
  7. Bigné J. Enrique, Andreu Luisa (2004) Emotions in segmentation: An Empirical Study, 31(3), 682–696.
  8. Previte Josephine, Russell-Bennett Rebekah, Mulcahy Rory, Hartel Charmine (2019) The role of emotional value for reading and giving eWOM in altruistic services, Journal of Business Research, Volume 99, June 2019, 157-166.
  9. Correia A., Moital M., Oliveira N., Costa C. F. (2009) Multidimensional segmentation of gastronomic tourists based on motivation and satisfaction, International Journal of Tourism Policy, 2, 58–71.
  10. Petrick James F. (2002) Development of a Multi-Dimensional Scale for Measuring the Perceived Value of a Service, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 119-134.
  11. Corvec Stéphanie, Zhao Jinhua (2020) Travel Behaviour and Society, Volume 20, July 2020, 2-21.
  12. Friman Margareta, Gärling Tommy, Ettema Dick, Olsson Lars E. (2017) How does travel affect emotional well-being and life satisfaction, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 106, December 2017, 170-180.
  13. Barria Carlos, Guevara Angelo, Jimenez Angel, Seriani Sebastian (2022) Relating Emotions, Psychophysiological Indicators and Context in Public Transport Trips: Case Study and a Joint Framework for Data Collection and Analysis. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4133094 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4133094
  14. Zeithaml Valarie A., Verleye Katrien, Hatak Isabella, Koller Monika. (2021) Three Decades of Customer Value Research: Paradigmatic Roots and Future Research Avenues. Journal of Service Research, 23(4), 409-432.
  15. Gummerus Johanna (2013) Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory: Strangers or siblings?, Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19–46.
  16. Monroe Kent B., Chapman Joseph D. (1987) Framing Effects on Buyers’ Subjective Product Evaluations, Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 14, 193-197.
  17. Bolton R.N., Drew J.H. (1991) A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value, Journal of Consumer Research 17(4), 375–384.
  18. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
  19. Boksberger Philipp E., Melsen Lisa (2011) Perceived Value: A Critical Examination of Definitions, Concepts and Measures for the Service Industry,” Journal of Services Marketing, 25 (3), 229–240.
  20. Gale Bradley T. (1994) Managing customer value, Free Press, New York, p. 456, Dodds Bill (2003) Managing customer value: essentials of product quality, customer service, and price decisions, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, p. 364.
  21. Kordupleski, R. E.; Vogel, W. C. (2015). The Right Choice--What Does It Mean? Groundbreaking Research from the Early Days of Customer Value Management. Journal of Creating Value, 1(1), 3–22.
  22. Booms B.H., Bitner M.J. (1981) Marketing Strategies and Organization Structures for Service Firms. In: Marketing of Services, American Marketing Association, Chicago, 47-51.
  23. Constantinides E. (2006) The Marketing Mix Revisited: Towards the 21st Century Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management, 22(3), 407–438.
  24. Babin Barry J., Darden William R., Griffin Mitch (1994) Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value, Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644–656.
  25. Calvo-Porral C., Otero-Prada L.-M. (2021) The emotional influence on satisfaction and complaint behavior in hedonic and utilitarian services, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 471-488.
  26. Rezapour Mahdi, Ferraro F. Richard (2021) The impact of commuters’ psychological feelings due to delay on perceived quality of a rail transport, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume 8(1), Article number 190.
  27. Olsen Svein Ottar, Nina Prebensen, Thomas A. Larsen (2009) Including ambivalence as a basis for benefit segmentation. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 762–783.
  28. Likert R. (1932) A technique for the measurements of attitudes, Archives of psychology, 140(22), 5-55.
  29. Ettema Dick, Gärling Tommy, Eriksson Lars, Friman Margareta, Olsson Lars E., Fujii Satoshi (2011) Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 14, Issue 3, 167-175.
  30. Huang Ming-Hui (2001) The Theory of Emotions in Marketing, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 239-247.
  31. Dubé, L., Menon, K. (2000) Multiple Roles of Consumption Emotions in Post-Purchase Satisfaction with Extended Service Transactions. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11, 287-304.
  32. Laros Fleur J.M., Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E.M. (2005) Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach, Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445.
  33. Little J.D.C. (1970) Models and managers: The concept of a decision calculus, Management Science, 16, 466-485.
  34. Sullivan C., O'fallon C. (2009) Segmentation research for sustainable transport: do’s and don’ts, Presented at 31st Australasian Transport Research Forum, Auckland, October 2009.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2024-2-59-012-023

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving