Article

Received 06.09.2023

Revised 25.11.2023

Accepted 27.12.2023

Retrieved from Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023

Pages 153 -167

Vorkut, T., & Volynets, L. (2023). A system of indicators for assessing the level of sustainability of the development of enterprises of logistics providers and approaches to its implementation. The National Transport University Bulletin, 27(3), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2023-3-57-153-167

A system of indicators for assessing the level of sustainability of the development of enterprises of logistics providers and approaches to its implementation

Tetiana Vorkut Lyudmila Volynets

The relevance of the research topic is determined by the need to implement a strategic-oriented assessment of the activities of enterprises that provide logistics services in the context of promoting the sustainability of the development of the Ukrainian economy in the context of the country's integration into the EU. 167 The purpose of the study: to develop an integral indicator for assessing the balance of sustainable development of a logistics provider enterprise, as such, which consists of decentralized homogeneous structural units (OSUs) and creates a total value for customers and/or consumers through OSO data, and to propose approaches to the formation of a mechanism for the implementation of this indicator The object of the research is the process of evaluating the activities of enterprises of logistics providers. The subject of the study is the methods and models of the formation of indicator systems for evaluating the activities of enterprises of logistics providers. Tasks of the research: 1) to conduct an analysis of scientific studies that consider the problems of forming systems for evaluating the activities of enterprises of logistics providers; 2) to propose an integral indicator for evaluating the balance of sustainable development of enterprises of logistics providers, which consist of decentralized homogeneous structural units. Research methodology. When conducting an analysis of scientific works, which consider the problem of forming systems for evaluating the activities of logistics providers, the method of scientific identification was used; when developing indicators for assessing the balance of sustainable development of enterprises of logistics providers, the approach of weighted criteria was used with the development of a model of an integral indicator

sustainable development; balanced scorecard; logistics provider enterprises
  1. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. 1st ed. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2000.
  2. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The Balanced Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 1996.
  3. Vorkut T. A., Bilonog O. Ye., Dmytrichenko A. M., Tretynychenko Y. O. Supply Chain Management: Logistic Aspect. Kyiv: National Transport University, 2017.
  4. Vorkut T. A., Bilonoh O. Ye., Dmytrychenko A. M., Petunin A. V., Sribna N. V., Tretynychenko Yu. O. Portfelno-oriientovane upravlinnia v orhanizatsiinykh merezhakh: Monohrafiia. Kyiv: Milenium, 2021. 227 p.
  5. Brewer P. C., Speh T. W. Using the Balanced Scorecard to Measure Supply Chain Performance. The Journal of Business Logistics. 2000. Vol. 21, No. 1. P. 75–93.
  6. Volynets L. Conceptual principles of sustainable development of the transport industry of Ukraine in the context of financial security of the state. In: Upravlinskyi aspekt zabezpechennia finansovoi bezpeky Ukrainy: Monohrafiia. Cherkasy: CHNU named after B. Khmelnytskyi, 2019. P. 252–272.
  7. Volynets L. M. Scientific and Methodological Approaches to Balancing Indicators of Sustainable Development of Multimodal Freight Transport in International Communication. Economic Journal of the Transport Complex. 2018. No. 32. P. 137–151.
  8. Saeensus M. A. Concepts and Criteria for Sustainable Operation of Logistics Systems. Problems of the System Approach in Economics. 2019. No. 1(69), Part 2. P. 72–77.
  9. Koblyanska I. I. Scientific and Methodological Foundations of Environmentally Oriented Logistic Management of Industrial Production. Sumy: Sumy State University, 2011.
  10. Krykavskyi Y. V., Chernopyatka N. V. Logistics and Sustainable Development: Interaction of Concepts. Thesis. Sumy: Sumy State University, 2012.
  11. Mishenin Y. V., Koblyanska I. I. Logistic Management of Industrial Production in the Context of the Development of the “Green” Economy in Ukraine. The Economist. 2012. No. 1. P. 8–12.
  12. Mniokh O. B., Sapotnytska N. Y. Global and National Experience in Solving Logistic Problems in the Context of Sustainable Development. Bulletin of the National University of Water Management and Natural Resources. Economic Sciences. 2018. No. 2. P. 137–149.
  13. Lazorenko T. V. Sustainable Development as the Basis for Enterprise Economic Growth. In: Business, Innovations, Management: Problems and Prospects: Abstracts of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference (April 22, 2021). Kyiv: KPI named after Igor Sikorsky, Publishing House “Politekhnika”, 2021. P. 90–91.
  14. Murphy P. R. Green Logistics: Comparative Views of Environmental Progressives, Moderates, and Conservatives. Council of Logistics Management, 1996. Available at: https://trid.trb.org/view/560391
  15. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2006.
  16. Niven P. R. Balanced Scorecard Diagnostics: Maintaining Maximum Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  17. Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  18. Deming W. E. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1986.
  19. Neave G. W. Organization as System: Principles for Building a Sustainable Business by Edwards Deming. 2nd ed. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2011.
  20. Keller S. B., Savitskie K., Stank T. P., Lynch D. F., Ellinger A. Summary and Analysis of Multi-item Scales Used in Logistics Research. Journal of Business Logistics. 2002. Vol. 23, No. 2. P. 83–281.

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2023-3-57-153-167