• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 01.06.2022

Revised 23.10.2022

Accepted 28.11.2022

Retrieved from Vol. 26, No. 4, 2022

Pages 69 -76

  • 42 Views

Suggested citation

Zakharova, Yu. (2022). Аproaches analysis to the essence and content defining of the quality education. The National Transport University Bulletin, 26(4), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2022-4-54-069-076

Аproaches analysis to the essence and content defining of the quality education

Yu. Zakharova

Abstract

In modern society, which is constantly developing and changing, the reformation and improvement of the existing education system is gaining more relevance, where increase the level of its quality is the central problem for all stakeholders. Working on integration into the European educational space and on practical accession to the Bologna process, Ukraine, in the context of European requirements, carries out the modernization of educational activities, where the quality of education covers various directions in this field. This is both the quality of teaching, and the quality of training, and the quality of research, which, in turn, is a sign of the quality of the staff and program, and, as a result, of the quality of learning. Therefore, the purpose of our article is to analyze the content of the concept of quality of education, how it is defined and what indicators it depends on. On the website of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, for example, the concept of quality of education is interpreted as a set of characteristics of the educational process that define the consistent and practically effective formation of competence and professional consciousness. This is a certain level of knowledge and skills, intellective, physical and moral development achieved by graduates of an educational institution in accordance with the planned goals of study and education. Summarizing the approaches of various scientists to the interpretation of the concept of quality of education, we can conclude that the quality of education is, first of all, an integral characteristic of the education system, which is a reflection of the level of compliance of resource provision, educational process and educational results with normative requirements, social and personal expectations. Secondly, the concept of quality of education is interpreted as a set of various components, the most important of which are those that define the level of knowledge, abilities, skills, competencies, personal and professional qualities and achievements of all participants in the educational process. Thirdly, the quality of education is a systemic concept, it is a category that reflects all aspects of the development of the educational system. Fourth, at the state level, the quality of education is the compliance of the educational system with the requirements and standards of society. In addition, the analysis of the approaches of scientists makes it possible to define the main structural elements of the quality of education, which resembles a hierarchical system, and consists of three main interrelated components - the quality of the educational process conditions, the quality of the educational process content, and the quality of the educational process result. Despite the existing variety of definitions, the problem of the quality of education continues to be relevant and needs to be defined as a scientific category. Further research requires a clear definition of the indicators system and criteria that qualitatively affect the effectiveness of the educational process.

 

Keywords:

quality education; quality in higher education; educational process; Bologna process; indicators of quality education; legal and regulatory documents

References

  1. «Pro Natsionalnu doktrynu rozvytku osvity»: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 17 kvitnia 2002 roku № 347/2002. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/347/2002#Text (application date: 11.10.2022)
  2. «Pro Natsionalnu stratehiiu rozvytku osvity v Ukraini na period do 2021 roku»: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 25 chervnia 2013 roku № 344/2013. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/344/2013#n10 (application date: 11.10.2022)
  3. Annienkova, I. P. (2011). Kontseptualni zasady systemy upravlinnia yakistiu osvity u VNZ // Nauka i osvita. № 6. URL: https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2011/6_2011/5.pdf (application date: 11.10.2022)
  4. Batechko, N. (2017). Fenomen yakosti vyshchoi osvity v suchasnomu naukovomu dyskursi / N. H. Batechko // Osvitolohichnyi dyskurs. № 3-4. S. 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2017.3-4.16 (application date: 11.10.2022)
  5. Biliakovska, O. O. (2017). Yakist osvity: do henezy poniattia // Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Pedahohichni nauky». T. 1, № 76. S. 24-28. URL: https://ps.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/ps/article/view/47
  6. Bolonskyi protses // «Vyshcha osvita» Informatsiino-analitychnyi portal pro vyshchu osvitu v Ukraini ta za kordonom. URL: http://vnz.org.ua/bolonskyj-protses (application date: 11.10.2022)
  7. Bulakh, I. S. (2006). Yakist osvity ta upravlinnia yakistiu: holovni pokaznyky vyznachennia yakosti osvity / I. Bulakh // Pisliadyplom. osvita v Ukraini. № 1. S. 71-74. [in Ukrainian]
  8. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu» // Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR). 2014. № 37-38. St. 2004. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18 (application date: 11.10.2022)
  9. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» // Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR). 2017. № 38-39. St. 380. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text (application date: 11.10.2022)
  10. Zinchenko, V. (2011) Yakist vyshchoi osvity v ofitsiinykh dokumentakh Bolonskoi hrupy // Molod i rynok. №11 (82). S. 113-117. [in Ukrainian]
  11. Kilova, H. O. (2012). Yakist osvity yak kliuchova katehoriia menedzhmentu osvity // Osvita ta pedahohichna nauka. № 5-6 (154-155). S. 22-26. URL: http://pedagogicaljournal.luguniv.edu.ua/archive/2012/N5-6/article/4/Kilyova_ua.pdf (application date: 11.10.2022)
  12. Korotkov, Ye. Kontseptsiia yakosti osvity. URL: http://osvita.ua/school/manage/1342 (application date: 11.10.2022)
  13. Luniachek, V. E. (2009). Yakist osvity – teoretychnyi kontekst / V. E. Luniachek // Obrii. № 1 (28). S. 10–13. [in Ukrainian]
  14. Liashenko, O. (2004). Stratehiia yakosti yak osnova osvitnoi polityky krain svitu // Monitorynh yakosti osvity: svitovi dosiahnennia ta ukrainski perspektyvy/ Za zah. red. O.I. Lokshynoi. K.: “K.I.S”. S. 9-14. [in Ukrainian]
  15. Liashenko, O. (2005). Yakist osvity yak osnova funktsionuvannia y rozvytku suchasnykh system osvity // Pedahohika i psykholohiia. №1(46). S. 5-12. [in Ukrainian]
  16. Nikolaievskyi, V. M. (2001). Sotsiolohichna osvita v Ukraini: kryterii ta osvitni stratehii dosiahnennia yakosti // Metodolohiia, teoriia ta praktyka sotsiolohichnoho analizu suchasnoho suspilstva. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kharkiv, S. 393-396. [in Ukrainian]
  17. Orhanizatsiino-metodychne zabezpechennia monitorynhovykh doslidzhen yakosti zahalnoi serednoi osvity : Monohrafiia / Za red. Liashenko O.I. K. : Pedahohichna dumka, 2011. 160 s. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/2967/1/Orhanizatsiino-metodychne_zabezpechennia_monitorynhovykh_doslidzhen-Monohrafiia.pdf (application date: 11.10.2022)
  18. Ostroverkhova, N. (2005). Otsinka yakosti osvity // Osvita i upravlinnia. T. 8, № 1. S. 109-113. [in Ukrainian]
  19. Pro Derzhavnu natsionalnu prohramu «Osvita» («Ukraina XXI stolittia»): Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 3 lystopada 1993 r. № 896. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/896-93-%D0%BF#top (application date: 11.10.2022)
  20. Standart ISO 9000-2007. Standarty i rekomendatsii shchodo zabezpechennia yakosti v Yevropeiskomu prostori vyshchoi osvity. Kyiv. Lenvit, 2006. 36 s. [in Ukrainian]
  21. Tkachuk, L. V. (2010). Kontseptsiia pedahohichnoi osvity v oblasti: yakist osvity // Natsionalna akademiia pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy. URL: https://dspace.udpu.edu.ua/bitstream/6789/2196/1/ (application date: 11.10.2022)
  22. Khliebnikova, T. M. (2009). Kvalimetrychnyi pidkhid do vyvchennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity // Teoriia ta metodyka upravlinnia osvitoiu. № 2. URL: http://umo.edu.ua/images/content/nashi_vydanya/metod_upr_osvit/v_5/26.pdf (application date: 11.10.2022)
  23. Shchudlo, S. A. (2012) Vyshcha osvita u poshukakh yakosti: quo vadis : monohrafiia / Svitlana Shchudlo; M-vo osvity i nauky, molodi ta sportu Ukrainy, Kharkiv. nats. un-t imeni V. N. Karazina, Drohob. derzh. ped. un-t imeni Ivana Franka. Kharkiv; Drohobych: Kolo, 339 c. URL: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/ua/ (application date: 11.10.2022)
  24. Yakist vyshchoi osvity: teoriia i praktyka: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk / za nauk. red. A. Vasyliuk, M. Dei; kol. avtoriv: A. Vasyliuk, M. Dei, V. Bazeliuk (ta in.]; NAPN Ukrainy, Universytet menedzhmentu osvity. Kyiv; Nizhyn: Vydavets PP Lysenko M. M., 2019. 176 s. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/717657/1/Posibnyk_yakist vyshchoi osvity.pdf (application date: 11.10.2022)
  25. Yakist osvity: Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi veb-portal. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/yakist-osviti (application date: 11.10.2022)
  26. Harvey, L., Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Volume 18, Issue 1. P. 9-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102 (application date: 11.10.2022)
  27. Parri, J. (2006). Quality in Higher Education / J. Parri // Management. № 2 (11). P. 107-111. [in English]
  28. Planning the quality of education: the collection and use of data for informed decision-making. Ed. By K. Ross et al. Paris: UNESCO, 1990. 160 p. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000086680 (application date: 11.10.2022)
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2022-4-54-069-076

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving