Article

Received 28.05.2025

Revised 19.10.2025

Accepted 27.11.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 2, 2025

Pages 8 -17

Bakulich, O., Samoylenko, Ye., Holodenko, V., & Hrebelnyk, M. (2025). Ecological and economic assessment of enterprise sustainable development management. The National Transport University Bulletin, 29(2), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-2-29-08-17

Ecological and economic assessment of enterprise sustainable development management

Olena Bakulich Yevhen Samoylenko Viktoriia Holodenko Микола Hrebelnyk

The article examined the ecological and economic management of the sustainable development of an enterprise. It considered the theoretical foundations of sustainable development as well as the practical aspects of its implementation at the enterprise level, with particular attention paid to achieving a balance between economic efficiency and environmental responsibility. The purpose of the study was to determine effective mechanisms for managing the sustainable development of enterprises through an assessment of the interrelated ecological and economic factors influencing their activities. The object of the study was the municipal transport enterprise Kyivpastrans, and the research was aimed at identifying effective mechanisms for managing its sustainable development. The relationships between the ecological and economic indicators of the enterprise’s performance were analysed, key factors affecting its environmental and financial stability were identified, and the enterprise’s resilience to external ecological and economic challenges was assessed. The research employed statistical and graphical methods, as well as mathematical modelling, which made it possible to quantitatively evaluate the relationships between ecological and economic characteristics and to develop proposals for their optimisation. Quantitative assessment methods were used to determine the dynamics of sustainable development indicators and to substantiate approaches to their further optimisation. The results obtained generalised the methodological foundations for improving sustainable development management in urban public transport enterprises. The interdependence between environmental and economic performance indicators was identified, enabling an assessment of enterprises’ resistance to external environmental changes and their adaptability to contemporary challenges. The practical significance of the study lay in the development of recommendations aimed at enhancing enterprise efficiency in accordance with the principles of sustainable development. The findings could be used as a decision-making tool in environmental and economic planning

sustainability indicators; ecological performance; economic efficiency; urban transport enterprise; Kyivpastrans; management tools; adaptive development
  1. Aref’yeva, O.V., Safonik, N.P., & Dudik, A.O. (2023). Strategic analysis of the development of transport enterprises under innovative trends. Problems of Contemporary Transformations. Series: Economics and Management, 7. doi: 10.54929/2786-5738-2023-7-04-16.
  2. Bakulich, O., Holodenko, V., & Zaiats, O. (2021). Environmental-oriented model of integrated management. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 1(33). doi: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30032021/7471.
  3. Bakulich, O.O., & Kis, I.R. (2021). Situational method of environmental risk management of transport industry enterprises projects in a circular economy. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 46, 6-11. doi: 10.32347/2412-9933.2021.46.6-11.
  4. Bekun, F.V., Alola, A.A., & Sarkodie, S.A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of The Total Environment, 657, 1023-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104.
  5. Boeing, G., et al. (2022). Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities. The Lancet Global Health, 10(6), 907-918. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00072-9.
  6. Burchart, D., & Przytuła, I. (2024). Sustainability assessment methods for the transport sector considering the life cycle concept – a review. Sustainability, 16(18), article number 8148. doi: 10.3390/su16188148.
  7. Filipishyna, L.M. (2017). Integrated assessment of industrial enterprises’ development stability. Economics and Enterprise Management, 19, 280-285.
  8. Gavrykov, D. (2025). Innovative and digital transformations as a path to sustainable development of transport complex enterprises. International Science Journal of Management, Economics & Finance, 4(4), 96-103. doi: 10.46299/j.isjmef.20250404.10.
  9. Gruetzmacher, S.B., Vaz, C.B., & Ferreira, Â. (2022). Sustainability performance assessment of the transport sector in European countries. Faculty of Engineering Journal, 104, 42-52. doi: 10.17533/udea.redin.20210742.
  10. Karapysh, A.S., Kharchenko, O.I., & Barkalova, N.O. (2025). Analysis of socio-economic provisions of sustainable development of transport enterprises. Transport Systems and Transportation Technologies, 29, 95-102. doi: 10.15802/tstt2025/325489.
  11. Kudriavtsev, V.M. (2025). Sustainable development of the transport enterprise: Integration of economic, social and environmental criteria. Economics of the Transport Complex, 45, 239-250. doi: 10.30977/ETK.2225-2304.2025.45.239.
  12. Kudriavtsev, V.M., & Kudriavtseva, O.V. (2023). Methodology for assessing the level of sustainable development of a transport enterprise. Economics of the Transport Complex, 42, 168-181. doi: 10.30977/ETK.2225-2304.2023.42.168.
  13. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Environmental sustainability within attaining sustainable development goals: The role of digitalization and the transport sector. Sustainability, 15, article number 11282. doi: 10.3390/su151911282.
  14. Kyivpastrans. (2023). Cash flow statement (direct method) for 2022. Retrieved from https://kpt.kyiv.ua/uploads/u/1/dPAhNiK8-L6GWu0wWEGiFIlDBxoPMsn_.pdf#toolbar=0.
  15. Kyivpastrans. (2024). Cash flow statement (direct method) for 2023. Retrieved from https://kpt.kyiv.ua/uploads/u/1/jkaBltJgx2VDL7PkOGTF-RzTw9XfadbE.pdf#toolbar=0.
  16. Pylypenko, S.M. (2020). Strategic enterprise management based on the concept of sustainable development. Economics and Society, 21, 79-85. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2019-20-47.
  17. Rossolov, A., & Lyfenko, S. (2021). Assessment of sustainable development scenarios of city transport systems under car-oriented mobility. Central Ukrainian Scientific Bulletin. Technical Sciences, 4(35), 221-231. doi: 10.32515/2664-262X.2021.4(35).221-231.
  18. Širá, E., Kotulič, R., Kravčáková Vozárová, I., & Daňová, M. (2021). Sustainable development in EU countries in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy. Processes, 9(3), article number 443. doi: 10.3390/pr9030443.
  19. Soti, V., Pratap, S., Dwivedi, A., & Lakshay. (2023). A structural equation modeling framework for studying sustainable freight transportation indicators in emerging economies. Decision Analytics Journal, 9, article number 100337. doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100337.
  20. Soufiemami, M. (2022). Ameliorating transport system focusing on sustainability and inclusiveness through a mixed-method research (a case study in Tehran, Iran). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07504.
  21. Suprayoga, G.B., Bakker, M., Witte, P., & Spit, T. (2020). A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects. European Transport Research Review, 12, article number 19. doi: 10.1186/s12544-020-0400-6.
  22. Vlasova, V., & Shynkaruk, O. (2025). Preconditions for the formation of an innovative strategy for sustainable development of transport enterprises. Economics and Society, 75. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2025-75-47.

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-2-29-08-17