• Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

The National Transport University Bulletin

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 10.07.2025

Revised 25.10.2025

Accepted 27.11.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 2, 2025

Pages 82 -93

  • 208 Views

Suggested citation

Porfirenko, V. (2025). Innovative standardised modular management system for replacement and charging of electric vehicle batteries. The National Transport University Bulletin, 29(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-2-29-82-93

Innovative standardised modular management system for replacement and charging of electric vehicle batteries

Volodymyr Porfirenko

Abstract

The article examined the potential for enhancing the production and operational systems of electric vehicles through the implementation of an innovative, standardised modular approach to battery replacement and charging. The study focused on passenger electric cars and electric buses used in urban and intercity transportation, which are equipped with lithium-ion battery systems. Particular attention was given to the systemic limitations of existing electric vehicle infrastructure, including long charging times, the lack of battery and connector standardisation, high production and maintenance costs, and their adverse effects on the widespread adoption of electric mobility solutions. The aim of the study was to develop and substantiate a unified modular model for battery replacement and charging, designed to reduce vehicle downtime and improve operational efficiency. The research methodology incorporated system and comparative analysis, statistical methods, and graphical modelling to investigate modular battery architectures and infrastructure standardisation, alongside an environmental impact assessment comparing electric vehicles with internal combustion vehicles. The study drew on scientific literature, reports from international organisations (International Energy Agency, International Renewable Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization), statistical databases, regulatory documents, and open-access industry sources. The findings confirmed that vehicles with internal combustion engines are significant sources of CO₂, NOₓ, and fine particulate matter emissions, contributing to climate change, air pollution, and the deterioration of public health. In contrast, electric vehicles demonstrate a substantially lower environmental impact, higher energy efficiency, and reduced maintenance costs. Based on the analysis, a unified modular battery replacement system was proposed, which facilitates rapid energy replenishment, enhances interoperability, reduces infrastructure costs, and fosters the development of a sustainable electric mobility ecosystem. The study concluded that the lack of sufficient standardisation in battery systems and charging infrastructure hinders large-scale electric vehicle adoption, whereas a modular and unified vehicle architecture substantially reduces downtime and improves manufacturing flexibility and infrastructure scalability

Keywords:

environmental concerns; charging infrastructure; economic efficiency; maintenance costs; electric mobility

References

  1. A complete guide to the types of electric vehicles: BEV, PHEV, FCEV, and HEV. (2024). Retrieved from https://en.yutong.com/technology/industry-insights/technologies/2024/1785230859293560832.shtml.
  2. Alhazmi, Y.A. (2025). Electric vehicle battery swap stations: An overview and critical analysis. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture. doi: 10.1007/s43995-025-00215-z.
  3. Alternative Fuels Observatory. (2025). Norway: Incentives and legislation for electric vehicles. Retrieved from https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/transport-mode/road/norway.
  4. Annual CO₂ emissions per country. (2024). Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country.
  5. Annual CO₂ emissions. (2025). Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country?time=1912..latest.
  6. Bharadwaj, R. (2023). Exploring South Korea’s EV success. Retrieved from https://bolt.earth/blog/south-korean-ev-market?srsltid=AfmBOooh5HKzA8jsDOHlTAyrD6aI0JAcXtay_IzmlKZojl5qL8Op9jUL.
  7. Canis, B., Clark, C.E., & Sherlock, M.F. (2019). Vehicle electrification: Federal and state issues affecting deployment. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
  8. ChargerIGS. (2025). The future of EV charging. Retrieved from https://chargerigs.com/future-of-ev-charging/.
  9. Chen, F. (2025). Chinese EV maker NIO and battery king CATL to join forces on swapping stations, technology. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/3302857/chinese-ev-maker-nio-and-battery-king-catl-join-forces-swapping-stations-technology.
  10. Husmann, J., Beylot, A., Perdu, F., Pinochet, M., Cerdas, F., & Herrmann, C. (2024). Towards consistent life cycle assessment modelling of circular economy strategies for electric vehicle batteries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 50, 556-570. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.001.
  11. IEA. (2025a). Global energy review 2025: CO₂ emissions. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/co2-emissions.
  12. IEA. (2025b). Global EV outlook 2025: Electric vehicle charging. Retrieved from​ https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025/electric-vehicle-charging.
  13. IRENA. (2024). Critical materials: Batteries for electric vehicles. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Sep/Critical-materials-Batteries-for-electric-vehicles.
  14. Jiang, R., Wu, C., Feng, W., You, K., Liu, J., Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Cheng, H.-M. (2025). Impact of electric vehicle battery recycling on reducing raw material demand and battery life-cycle carbon emissions in China. Scientific Reports, 15, article number 2267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86250-1.
  15. Joshi, A., Mishra, D.K., Singh, R., Zhang, J., & Ding, Y. (2025). A comprehensive review of solid-state batteries. Applied Energy, 386, article number 125546. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125546.
  16. Liu, Z., Ma, X., Liu, X., de Almeida Correia, G.H., Shi, R., & Shang, W. (2023). Optimising electric taxi battery swapping stations featuring modular battery swapping: A data-driven approach. Applied Sciences, 13(3), article number 1984. doi: 10.3390/app13031984.
  17. Mdallal, A., Yasin, A., Alaboudy, A.H.K., & ElSaid, K. (2025). Advancements in EV charging standards and technologies for sustainable transportation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technology. doi: 10.53941/rest.2025.100010.
  18. Mesquita, A.R., de Abreu, V.H.S., Poyares, C.N., & Santos, A.S. (2025). Barriers to electric vehicle adoption: A framework to accelerate the transition to sustainable mobility. Sustainability, 17(18), article number 8318. doi: 10.3390/su17188318.
  19. Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine. (2022). Ukravtodor approved the action plan to support electromobility. Retrieved from https://mindev.gov.ua/news/33403-ukravtodor-zatverdiv-plan-zaxodiv-z-pidtrimki-elektromobilnosti.
  20. Norway the world leader in EVs. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.ecobatt.com.au/norway-the-world-leader-in-evs/.
  21. Oluwalana, O.J., & Grzesik, K. (2025). A systematic review of life cycle assessment of electric vehicles studies: Goals, methodologies, results and uncertainties. Energies, 18(22), article number 5867. doi: 10.3390/en18225867.
  22. Pedersen, K.L., Knudsen, R.M., Marinelli, M., Secchi, M., & Sevdari, K. (2025). Enabling grid services with bidirectional EV chargers: A comparative analysis of CCS2 and CHAdeMO response dynamics. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(11), article number 636. doi: 10.3390/wevj16110636.
  23. Porfirenko, V. (2025). Standardisation of electric vehicle battery production in international electric bus transportation based on the innovative modular principle. Standards-related Regional Innovation and International Cooperation, 1(1), 33-47. doi: 10.63385/sriic.v1.i1.317.
  24. Rawal, D. (2025). Securing the lifeblood of modern vehicles: OTA. Retrieved from https://www.t-systems.com/dk/en/insights/newsroom/expert-blogs/over-the-air-automotive-security-1046054.
  25. Schmidt, J. (2019). How one Japanese town is turning old EV batteries into street lamps. Retrieved from https://en.reset.org/second-life-batteries-electric-cars-japan-they-are-used-street-lamps-01272019/.
  26. Senn, B.A. (2023). How can cobalt be reduced in EV batteries? Retrieved from https://www.sciena.ch/research/how-can-cobalt-be-reduced-in-ev-batteries.html.
  27. Temporelli, A., Carvalho, M.L., & Girardi, P. (2020). Life cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries: An overview of recent literature. Energies, 13(11), article number 2864. doi: 10.3390/en13112864.
  28. The future of automotive technology: Exploring OTA updates in cars. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.motorfinity.uk/blog/ota-updates-in-cars/.
  29. There are 20,000 more electric cars in Ukraine than in Poland. (2023). Retrieved from https://eauto.org.ua/en/news/375-there-are-20-000-more-electric-cars-in-ukraine-than-in-poland.
  30. UkraineInvest. (2024). Electric cars market growth: How Ukraine can benefit. Retrieved from https://ukraineinvest.gov.ua/en/news/electric-cars-market-growth-how-ukraine-can-benefit/.
  31. WHO. (2024). Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-%28outdoor%29-air-quality-and-health.
  32. Williment, C. (2025). How is Norway leading in the electric vehicle transition? Retrieved from https://sustainabilitymag.com/news/how-is-norway-leading-in-the-electric-vehicle-transition.
  33. Xiaomi SU7: A revolutionary EV experience. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.mi.com/global/discover/article?id=3263.
  34. Zhang, P. (2025). CATL plans to build over 2,500 swap stations by end-2026. Retrieved from https://cnevpost.com/2025/10/21/catl-plans-2500-swap-stations-2026/.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-2-29-82-93

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@ntu-bulletin.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving