Article

Received 15.06.2025

Revised 26.10.2025

Accepted 27.11.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 2, 2025

Pages 18 -29

Dobrovolskyi, O., & Navrotskyi, A. (2025). Analysis and synthesis of functional capabilities of monitoring systems of vehicle operation processes. The National Transport University Bulletin, 29(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-2-29-18-29

Analysis and synthesis of functional capabilities of monitoring systems of vehicle operation processes

Oleksandr Dobrovolskyi Andrii Navrotskyi

Vehicle monitoring and operational management systems constitute a key component of modern transport infrastructure. The aim of this study was to analyse and systematise the functional capabilities of vehicle operational monitoring systems. The functional features of existing vehicle monitoring systems were examined, analysed, and synthesised. The systematisation of hardware configurations within these systems was conducted using morphological analysis. The analysis and synthesis of functional capabilities were performed through the systematisation of hardware configurations in existing monitoring systems. A generalised morphological formula for an integrated vehicle monitoring system was developed, comprising five core functional elements: operator monitoring tools; vehicle condition monitoring tools; vehicle monitoring tools; infrastructure interaction monitoring tools; and information analysis and utilisation tools for end users. This formula captured twenty morphological characteristics of these functional elements, as implemented in current monitoring systems. The synthesis of permissible morphological variants enables the construction of actual system configurations and facilitates the identification of the structure and functional potential of existing monitoring systems. Existing vehicle monitoring systems were identified, and their capabilities for monitoring vehicle operation were determined. Based on an analysis of the advantages and limitations of the systems under study, appropriate conditions for their application were established, along with the level of implementation of core monitoring functions, and the potential for developing both basic and diverse system components. The practical value of this research lies in providing guidelines for optimising the design and deployment of vehicle monitoring systems to enhance operational efficiency and safety

control; registration of parameters; technical condition; hardware; morphological formula; systematisation
  1. Atia, M.M., Liu, S., Nematallah, H., Karamat, T.B., & Noureldin, A. (2015). Integrated indoor navigation system for ground vehicles with automatic 3-D alignment and position initialisation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(4), 1279-1292. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2397004.
  2. Bai, Y. (2016). Microcontroller engineering with MSP432: Fundamentals and applications (1st ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781315367101.
  3. Burlaka, S., Mytko, M., & Borysiuk, D. (2024). Analysis of diagnostic models for determining technical condition vehicles. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical Sciences, 6(1), 39-42. doi: 10.31891/2307-5732-2024-343-6-5.
  4. Cordoș, N., Duma, I., Moldovanu, D., Todoruț, A., & Barabás, I. (2025). An overview of intelligent transportation systems in Europe. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(7), article number 387. doi: 10.3390/wevj16070387.
  5. Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva: IPCC.
  6. Görne, L., Reuss, H.-C., Krätschmer, A., & Sauerwald, R. (2022). Smart data preprocessing method for remote vehicle diagnostics to increase data compression efficiency. Automotive and Engine Technology, 7, 307-316. doi: 10.1007/s41104-022-00113-9.
  7. Holovan, A., Gritsuk, I., Rudenko, S., & Kovalova, V. (2019). Aspects of forming the information V2I model of the transport vessel. In 2019 IEEE international conference on modern electrical and energy systems (MEES) (pp. 390-393). Kremenchuk: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/MEES.2019.8896595.
  8. Kacmarik, M., & Fojtik, D. (2023). Positioning performance of low-cost U-BLOX NEO-M8U module in urban environment. MM Science Journal, 3, 6776-6784. doi: 10.17973/MMSJ.2023_10_2023080.
  9. Kelller, M. (2004). Handbook emission factors for road transport 2.1 quick reference. Bern: HBEFA.
  10. Khudiakov, I.V. (2021). Improvement of methods for operational control of a vehicle’s technical condition under operating conditions. (Doctoral dissertation, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
  11. Khudiakov, I.V., Hrytsuk, I.V., Chernenko, V.V., Hrytsuk, Y.V., Pohorletskyi, D.S., Makarova, T.V., & Manzhelei, V.S. (2021). Features of modeling and construction of the information system of remote monitoring of the technical condition of vehicles. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Transport, 14(2), 140-148. doi: 10.31649/2413-4503-2021-14-2-140-148.
  12. Krueger, E., Schueler, T., & Arbesser-Rastburg, B. (2005). The standard tropospheric correction model for the European satellite navigation system Galileo. Kraków: General Assembly URSI.
  13. Mateichyk, V., & Navrotskyi, A. (2024). Systematisation of hardware schemes of vehicle operation monitoring systems. Bulletin of the Pryazovskyi State Technical University. Series: Technical Sciences, 48, 184-192. doi: 10.31498/2225-6733.48.2024.310711.
  14. Michailidis, E.T., Panagiotopoulou, A., & Papadakis, A.A. (2025). Review of OBD-II-based machine learning applications for sustainable, efficient, secure, and safe vehicle driving. Sensors, 25(13), article number 4057. doi: 10.3390/s25134057.
  15. Migal, V., Arhun, Sh., Hnatov, A., Hnatova, H., & Sokhin, P. (2022). Intelligent diagnostics of vehicles. Vehicle and Electronics Innovative Technologies, 22, 72-80. doi: 10.30977/VEIT.2022.22.0.5.
  16. Penna, N., Dodson, A., & Chen, W. (2001). Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model. Journal of Navigation, 54(1), 37-55. doi: 10.1017/S0373463300001107.
  17. Roozemond, D.A. (1999). Using autonomous intelligent agents for urban traffic control systems. In Proceedings of the 6th world congress on intelligent transport systems. Washington, DC: ITS America and MIRO digital publishing.
  18. Schüler, T. (2001). On ground-based GPS tropospheric delay estimation. (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Munich, Germany).
  19. Schwarz, K.-P. (Ed.). (2000). Geodesy beyond 2000. The challenges of the first decade, IAG general assembly Birmingham, July 19-30, 1999. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59742-8.
  20. Sipos, A. (2024). ICAO standards and recommended practices (SARPs). In International aviation law: Regulations in three dimensions (pp. 203-231). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-39066-1_4.
  21. Storm van Leeuwen, S., van der Marel, H., Tossaint, M.M.M., & Martelluci, A. (2004). Validation of SBAS MOPS troposphere model. Amsterdam: National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR).
  22. Yao, Y., Xu, C.Q., Shi, J., & Cao, N. (2015). ITG: A new global GNSS tropospheric correction model. Scientific Reports, 5, article number 10273. doi: 10.1038/srep10273.

https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2025-2-29-18-29